Improbable – The Paper Man

Improbable – The Paper Man

Improbable - The Paper Man (Foto: Martin Hauer)

What may sound like a straightforward story about football and Nazis turns out to be so much more. Laying bare the layers of society, of patriarchy and white privilege, The Paper Man playfully questions predominant narratives and power structures.

The Paper Man, a production by the renowned UK theatre company Improbable, attempts to tell the story of Matthias Sindelar, an Austrian football star who is said to have defied the Nazi regime by winning with his “Wunderteam” against Germany after the Anschluss in 1938. It was the last match as an independent Austrian team before it was to be integrated in Nazi Germany. Not long after the “Anschlussspiel”, Sindelar died under mysterious circumstances.

The story seems to have all the suspense and action that would make for a Hollywood blockbuster; however, instead it takes a different turn. With the bare stage, apart from one rather massive cross-like extendable structure, The Paper Man makes clear from the very outset that this is not going to be a traditional theatre production with a clear-cut plot, stock characters or dramatic arc. The three British actresses Vera Chok, Jess Mabel Jones and Anna-Maria Nabirye with their diverse backgrounds not only form counter-discourses to Lee Simpson’s white, male narrative, taking into account the female perspective as well as racial issues. The performers also question the very nature of the narrative and ask in how far a story depends on who is telling it, how the story is changed by the storyteller and what story is needed to be told, insisting that “We don’t need a story about another dead white man”.
The Paper Man wonderfully interweaves all these questions and story fragments in a free-floating, intuitive and loosely knit web of a performance that includes improvisation, shadow theatre, a round of questions and audience participation. This highly self-referential mosaic of bits and pieces of stories, football facts and raw emotion is held together by the theme of football and the story of Sindelar, which is forcefully accentuated by Adrienne Quartly’s sound design, who also contributes her own story to the play.

Matthias Sindelar was called the Paper Man, in original German “Der Papierene”, because of his slight build. The element paper reappears throughout the performance metaphorically as well as literally. White paper is used as the canvas for shadow plays that represent the settings of a Viennese coffee house, a club in London or mirror the diverse, multi-layered structure and story of the play through dynamic light fragments. White paper, however, is also being related to the dominant patriarchal and racial structures of society, in which counter-cultures and marginalised groups navigate and have to struggle to be heard. At one point in the show, one member of the cast states, “I tell my story on blank white paper”, thereby referring to a society created and dictated by white men.

While The Paper Man desperately (and purposefully) fails to tell Sindelar’s story, it accomplishes to create far more. The story of Sindelar is only the front that sparks what becomes a fiercely honest and playfully courageous confrontation with and re-negotiation of some of the sore spots of society, that is, the issues of race and gender and subsequently of discourse, narratives and art itself. So, how does a story end when the rules of the narrative are laid down by a different storyteller? Well, we dance; we dance to get to know each other.

The Paper Man opened at Norfolk and Norwich Festival in England, UK in May 2018 and performed at La Strada Festival in Graz, Austria on 1st and 2nd August this year. In early 2019, the show will tour the UK, including 4 weeks at the Soho Theatre, London, 11th February – 8th March 2019.

Fuck you mother!

Fuck you mother!

Can you make a preliminary reading of the text? This taboo-breaking was actually overdue. The meta-message of “I love you mother” – which is now being uttered in an inflationary manner on Mother’s Day – perpetuates an image of the mother that in many cases is purely a façade. There are countless children who have experienced physical or even psychological suffering at the hands of their mothers – but no one talks about it. Except for the “great savage” of contemporary theatre, Angélica Liddell. In her latest production, “Todo el cielo sobre la tierra” (El sindrome de Wendy), she pushes all the mothers off their supposed throne, which they have ascended qua the birth of their children, and shouts at them that there is no reason for them to claim a “dignity surcharge” for themselves.

.
Angélica Liddell at the Vienna Festival Angélica Liddell at the Vienna Festival (Photo: Nurith Wagner-Strauss)

What may sound a bit theoretical in these lines is not grey theory at all on stage at the Museumsquartier in Vienna. On the contrary, the work commissioned by the Wiener Festwochen 2013 really gets down to business there. Angélica Liddell is known for not hiding her emotions in a pent-up state, but on the contrary for really “letting it all hang out” on stage. If she were to verbally vomit out on the street or among friends all the weariness that she unleashes on the audience in the theatre, one would probably take a few steps back from her. In the theatre, however, you are supposedly sitting safely in your seat at some distance. The safety, however, is limited to physical integrity. Liddell raises her hand against no one – but she shoots her arrows of words at anyone and everyone who can hear her furious tirades. No one is exempt, as she makes it clear that she hates all people, especially crowds, and that it is only exceptional people, those who stand out from the crowd, who interest her. With her keen powers of observation, she scrapes all the social cement from the seams of interpersonal behaviour and relentlessly exposes the poverty, the pain but above all the stupidity of the masses. Alcohol, drugs and tablets – this triumvirate she detests above all else, because it makes people boring, infinitely boring. In the main part of this evening – which Liddell skilfully inserts into poetic images – she spares not only the audience but also herself in no way with her insults, which are like endless machine-gun salvos. Her physical constitution allows her to catapult her message against ugly mother-love over the edge of the stage in a grandiose choreography of movement. With the exception of a few minutes in which she sits on a chair and drinks mineral water from a plastic bottle to replenish her fluid balance, she is in constant motion, dancing, running, hitting objects, singing and shouting what her voice can give. “The house of rising sun”, in the version by Eric Burdon, provides her with an adequate musical layer, the lyrics of which point out that the mother should prevent her children from doing things that will harm them later. It is pointless to try to flee from this concentrated energy of intense stage performance and haunting blues interpretation. The length of this declaration of rage alone is enough for the audience not to be able to escape it permanently. Quite the opposite. The mental injuries the artist describes do not seem unfamiliar to many in the audience seats. It is not only the tense, continuous attention, but above all the repeated, almost imperceptible nodding of heads that makes it clear to many people that they know what terrible experiences Liddell is addressing here. And yet she makes it clear that mothers are not only perpetrators but also victims. That they only ever replicate what they themselves have experienced and so one Wendy gives birth to the next, this in turn to the next and so on. And all of them impose their “shitty experiences” – as Liddell puts it – on the next generation. Completely unreflective and therefore culpable. However, the play would not be very suitable for the theatre if the author, director and actress in one person had not added many more layers. Like the one in which she makes it clear that women who choose men who can mother them above all suffer from the so-called Wendy dilemma. “The people I love are all so small,” Liddell aptly describes this emotional relationship. But this also means that these women feel that the end of a relationship is catastrophic. As if the life entrusted to them had been snatched away, they bleed emotionally seemingly without end. An emotional state Liddell demonstrates in all her plays. A suffering that seemingly threatens to destroy her – and yet there is always a new Liddell and with this new Liddell a new performance.

Sindo Puche and Zhang Qiwen - Waltzing Dancers at the Vienna Festival Sindo Puche and Zhang Qiwen in Angélica Liddell’s play at the Vienna Festival

The small earth island heaped up in the middle of the stage and overhung by menacing crocodiles symbolises not only Peter Pan’s “Neverland”, where the children never grow up, but at the same time – as becomes clear at the very end of the performance – the Norwegian island of death Utøya, where 69 people, the majority of them teenagers, were shot by Anders Behring Breivik. The artist imputes to him the Peter Pan syndrome, that longing not to want to grow up, and thus gives her own interpretation of this horrific mass murder. In addition to Liddell’s own stage presence, however, there are two people in particular on this evening who, at first glance, appear to be completely unrelated to the psychodrama. Sindo Puche and Zhang Qiwen, 71 and 72 years old and from Shanghai, take one lap after the other around this island of horror in an enchanting sequence of light-footed waltzing steps. The woman in a yellow, flowing evening gown, her partner in a tailcoat, they dance to the music of Cho Young Wuk, interpreted by the Phace ensemble. Placed at their sides of the stage, the rest of the acting troupe, three men, one woman and Liddell, pause to watch the dancing in silence. In this moment, charged with great poetry, all that had previously been brought up is forgotten. Grief and pain, anger and powerlessness – they no longer play a role. Only the waltz music and the couple completely immersed in it from a distant culture in which the waltz has no tradition whatsoever enchant the audience. It becomes clear what keeps Angélica Liddell – and not only her – alive. It is moments like these that represent escapes from that everyday life that seems unbearable. Whether it is a dance, whether it is immersion in a book, whether it is empathy with someone’s suffering or thoughts of a dear, lost person. In all these states of being, we find ourselves in a flow that completely lifts us out of the everyday and brings us closer to ourselves than ever before. This theatrical interlude is not, as one might initially think, unrelated to what was shown before and after. Even Liddell’s demonstrations of masturbation and the narration of her preference for “perverted” sexual practices are directly related to her indictment of the emotional exploitation of children by their mothers, including her outbursts of rage, hatred and the deeply felt pain of abandonment. For it is precisely these states of flow that counteract the grief and violence, the pain and suffering with what amounts to an emotional liberation. A – figuratively speaking – brief erasure of the thought hard drive in which life becomes bearable. It is not surprising that the nihilist Liddell, who abhors any promise of salvation, finds peace in these exceptional emotional states and that the search for it can take on an addictive character. Those who were still receptive after this dense kaleidoscope of life learned at the end that youth is the only human state for Liddell in which life reaches its peak and is worthy of admiration. And so it was logically the handsome young Lennart Boyd Schürmann who held up a mirror to the “great savage” with impunity. He alone was allowed to hurl in her face the realisation that her actions were completely irrelevant, even offensive to many people, but it was also he alone who was able to appease Liddell with his beguiling gaze, so that peace returned in the end. A supposed peace, mind you, that will probably only last until Wendy, or Liddell?, is abandoned again. Theatre to empathise with and to reflect upon, with a gain in insight and the potential to spark social discussions about the false common sense of mother sanctification

Pin It on Pinterest